Comparison of sensitivity between gas chromatography–low-resolution mass spectrometry and gas chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry for determining metandienone metabolites in urine

Abstract

In doping control laboratories the misuse of anabolic androgenic steroids is commonly investigated in urine by gas chromatography–low-resolution mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring (GC–LRMS–SIM). By using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) detection sensitivity is improved due to reduction of biological background. In our study HRMS and LRMS methods were compared to each other. Two different sets were measured both with HRMS and LRMS. In the first set metandienone (I) metabolites 17α-methyl-5β-androstan-3α,17β-diol (II), 17-epimetandienone (III), 17β-methyl-5β-androst-1-ene-3α,17α-diol (IV) and 6β-hydroxymetandienone (V) were spiked in urine extract prepared by solid-phase extraction, hydrolysis with β-glucuronidase from Escherichia coli and liquid–liquid extraction. In the second set the metabolites were first spiked in blank urine samples of four male persons before pretreatment. Concentration range of the spiked metabolites was 0.1–10 ng/ml in both sets. With HRMS (resolution of 5000) detection limits were 2–10 times lower than with LRMS. However, also with the HRMS method the biological background hampered detection and compounds from matrix were coeluted with some metabolites. For this reason the S/N values of the metabolites spiked had to be first compared to S/N values of coeluted matrix compounds to get any idea of detection limits. At trace concentrations selective isolation procedures should be implemented in order to confirm a positive result. The results suggest that metandienone misuse can be detected by HRMS for a prolonged period after stopping the intake of metandienone.