Abstract

Fewer than 50% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) develop antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine. Preliminary data suggest that a heterologous vaccination, combining mRNA and viral vector vaccines, may increase immunogenicity. To assess the effectiveness of a third dose of an mRNA vs a vector vaccine in KTRs who did not have antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine. This was a single center, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized clinical trial of a third dose of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, conducted from June 15 to August 16, 2021, in 201 KTRs who had not developed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine. Data analyses were performed from August 17 to August 31, 2021. mRNA (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) or vector (Ad26COVS1) as a third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The primary study end point was seroconversion after 4 weeks (29-42 days) following the third vaccine dose. Secondary end points included neutralizing antibodies and T-cell response assessed by interferon-γ release assays (IGRA). In addition, the association of patient characteristics and vaccine response was assessed using logistic regression, and the reactogenicity of the vaccines was compared. Among the study population of 197 kidney transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 61.2 [12.4] years; 82 [42%] women), 39% developed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the third vaccine. There was no statistically significant difference between groups, with an antibody response rate of 35% and 42% for the mRNA and vector vaccines, respectively. Only 22% of seroconverted patients had neutralizing antibodies. Similarly, T-cell response assessed by IGRA was low with only 17 patients showing a positive response after the third vaccination. Receiving nontriple immunosuppression (odds ratio [OR], 3.59; 95% CI, 1.33-10.75), longer time after kidney transplant (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.15-1.83, per doubling of years), and torque teno virus plasma levels (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96, per doubling of levels) were associated with vaccine response. The third dose of an mRNA vaccine was associated with a higher frequency of local pain at the injection site compared with the vector vaccine, while systemic symptoms were comparable between groups. This randomized clinical trial found that 39% of KTRs without an immune response against SARS-CoV-2 after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine developed antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 4 weeks after a third dose of an mRNA or a vector vaccine. The heterologous vaccination strategy with a vector-based vaccine was well tolerated and safe but not significantly better than the homologous mRNA-based strategy. EudraCT Identifier: 2021-002927-39.

Highlights

  • Study Design This was an investigator-initiated, single center, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of a heterologous vaccination strategy using Ad26COVS1 compared with a homologous strategy using either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as a third dose in Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who did not develop SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine

  • The overall T-cell response assessed by IGRA was low with only 17 KTRs showing a positive reactivity against the SARSCoV-2 spike protein (9 in the mRNA and 8 in the vector group; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.27-2.64; P = .80)

  • The study findings show that a third dose of vaccine induced a SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in 39% of KTRs who had no seroconversion after 2 doses of mRNA vaccines

Read more

Summary

Methods

Study Design This was an investigator-initiated, single center, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of a heterologous vaccination strategy using Ad26COVS1 (viral vector) compared with a homologous strategy using either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (mRNA) as a third dose in KTRs who did not develop SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine. The trial was conducted from June 15 to August 16, 2021, at the Department of Nephrology and Dialysis at the Medical University of Vienna (Austria). The trial was registered with the European Union Clinical Trial Register and was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (No 1612/2021) as well as by the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call