Abstract

Ensembles of climate change projections created by general circulation models (GCMs) with high resolution are increasingly needed to develop adaptation strategies for regional climate change. The Meteorological Research Institute atmospheric GCM version 3.2 (MRI-AGCM3.2), which is listed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5), has been typically run with resolutions of 60 km and 20 km. Ensembles of MRI-AGCM3.2 consist of members with multiple cumulus convection schemes and different patterns of future sea surface temperature, and are utilized together with their downscaled data; however, the limited size of the high-resolution ensemble may lead to undesirable biases and uncertainty in future climate projections that will limit its appropriateness and effectiveness for studies on climate change and impact assessments. In this study, to develop a comprehensive understanding of the regional precipitation simulated with MRI-AGCM3.2, we investigate how well MRI-AGCM3.2 simulates the present-day regional precipitation around the globe and compare the uncertainty in future precipitation changes and the change projection itself between MRI-AGCM3.2 and the CMIP5 multiple atmosphere–ocean coupled GCM (AOGCM) ensemble. MRI-AGCM3.2 reduces the bias of the regional mean precipitation obtained with the high-performing CMIP5 models, with a reduction of approximately 20% in the bias over the Tibetan Plateau through East Asia and Australia. When 26 global land regions are considered, MRI-AGCM3.2 simulates the spatial pattern and the regional mean realistically in more regions than the individual CMIP5 models. As for the future projections, in 20 of the 26 regions, the sign of annual precipitation change is identical between the 50th percentiles of the MRI-AGCM3.2 ensemble and the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. In the other six regions around the tropical South Pacific, the differences in modeling with and without atmosphere–ocean coupling may affect the projections. The uncertainty in future changes in annual precipitation from MRI-AGCM3.2 partially overlaps the maximum–minimum uncertainty range from the full ensemble of the CMIP5 models in all regions. Moreover, on average over individual regions, the projections from MRI-AGCM3.2 spread over roughly 0.8 of the uncertainty range from the high-performing CMIP5 models compared to 0.4 of the range of the full ensemble.

Highlights

  • To establish mitigation and adaptation strategies for future climate change, studies on climate change and assessment of its impacts have been conducted worldwide

  • There is a large difference in northern South America where Meteorological Research Institute (MRI)-AGCM3.2 overestimates the precipitation and the mean of CMIP5Present_All underestimates it

  • 5 Summary We have shown that the simulations by MRIAGCM3.2 reproduce well the present-day precipitation climatology in regions around the globe and that the signs of future changes at the 50th percentile are identical to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) phase 5 (CMIP5) multi-atmosphere– ocean coupled general circulation models (GCMs) (AOGCM) ensemble in almost all regions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To establish mitigation and adaptation strategies for future climate change, studies on climate change and assessment of its impacts have been conducted worldwide. These recent studies have frequently used future climate projections simulated by multiple general circulation models (GCMs) in the framework of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP); e.g., the CMIP phase 5 (CMIP5; Taylor et al 2012). While the projections from GCMs and these study results are provided with 100-km or coarser resolution, strategies must be developed for regional and local scales. Regional climate models (RCMs) cannot represent phenomena with large temporal or spatial scales beyond their boundaries nor phenomena that are not well-represented in GCMs, such as tropical cyclones. The added value obtained by using enhancedresolution GCMs for various climate variabilities (e.g., in reproducing large-scale circulation features like the El Niño–Southern Oscillation) has been reviewed by Haarsma et al (2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call