Comparison of real‐time fluorescent RT‐PCR and conventional RT‐PCR for the detection of hepatitis E virus genotypes prevalent in China

Abstract

To compare the specificity and sensitivity of a real-time fluorescent RT-PCR assay with conventional RT-PCR, sera from 110 healthy blood donors, 120 patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B, and 416 patients with non-A-C acute hepatitis, as well as serial dilutions of HEV genotypes 1 and 4, were tested with both assays. All samples from healthy blood donors and patients with chronic hepatitis B were negative by both assays. Real-time RT-PCR could detect the same final dilution of genotype 1 as conventional RT-PCR but could detect a 10-fold lower concentration of genotype 4 than conventional RT-PCR. Of 416 samples from patients with a clinical diagnosis of non-A-C acute hepatitis, 127 (30.5%) and 83 (20.0%) were positive for HEV by real-time and conventional RT-PCR, respectively. The concordance of real-time and conventional RT-PCR was 80.8%. Furthermore, 96 and 57 of 171 samples were positive for anti-HEV IgM by real-time and conventional RT-PCR, respectively, and 31 and 26 of 245 samples negative for anti-HEV IgM, were positive by real-time and conventional RT-PCR, respectively. All amplicons positive by conventional RT-PCR were sequenced. Of 83 isolates, 7 and 76 belonged to genotypes 1 and 4, respectively. Thus, both assays have a high specificity, but the real-time RT-PCR assay is more sensitive than conventional RT-PCR. Furthermore, HEV genotype 4 is responsible for most sporadic cases of hepatitis E in the north of China.