Comparison of R2* and FerriScan liver iron concentration (LIC) quantification in the clinical classification of Iron overload states

Abstract

PurposeThis study assessed the clinical classification performance of an R2*-based MRI technique for LIC quantification relative to FerriScan, with intra-patient FerriScan LIC uncertainty taken into account. The variabilities of R2* and FerriScan LIC were also assessed. Materials and methodsThis was an ethics approved retrospective study, performed on patients undergoing chelation treatment for iron overload. 126 patients (69 women, 57 men), with an age of 42 +/− 16 years (range 19–86 years) were included. FerriScan and R2* MRI at 1.5 T were performed as part of a routine liver iron assessment protocol. For R2* MRI, a commercially available pulse sequence and reconstruction implementation was used, together with a previously derived calibration curve to convert R2* to LIC. Clinical classifications arising from R2*-derived LIC estimates were compared to those based on FerriScan. The accuracy and precision of the R2* technique was calculated. The variabilities of FerriScan- and R2*-derived estimates of LIC were compared with a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Significance was set at the 95% confidence level. ResultsThe precision of R2* ranged from 0.59 to 0.92, with an overall accuracy of 72%. When intra-patient FerriScan LIC uncertainty was considered, precision and accuracy increased to >94% and 97% respectively. The R2*-LIC variability (=17%) was significantly lower than the FerriScan-LIC variability (34%) at the 95% confidence level (p 〈10−3). ConclusionMRI R2*-based LIC estimates provided a similar clinical classification as FerriScan. The intra-patient uncertainty of R2*-based LIC estimates was significantly lower than FerriScan.