Comparison of precision and bias of scale, fin ray, and otolith age estimates for lake whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis) in Lake Champlain

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

We compared the precision, bias, and reader uncertainty of scales, dorsal fin rays, and otolith age estimates from 151 lake whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis) from Lake Champlain, 2009. Mean and systematic differences in age estimates were compared among structures using consensus ages from two readers; precision of age structures was quantified through the use of age–bias plots, coefficient of variation, and percent agreement; reader confidence was indexed as a measure of overall reader uncertainty for each individual fish by structure. Mean age estimates based on otoliths were systematically higher (7.8 years) than based on scales (6.0 years) or fin rays (5.6 years). Ages determined using otoliths generated a wider range of ages and greater number of age classes (1–23 years, 20 age classes) when compared with scales (1–16 years, 15 age classes) and fin rays (1–14 years, 13 age classes). Otoliths were the most precise of the structures (CV = 4.7, compared with 7.4 for scales and 12.1 for fin rays). Percent agreement between readers indicated high precision and reproducibility of age estimates using otoliths. Percent reader uncertainty was lowest when using otoliths (7.6%) in comparison with fin rays (21.2%) or scales (26.8%). This study is the first evaluation of precision and bias of age structures for Lake Champlain's unexploited lake whitefish population and suggests that otoliths are the most appropriate structure for age estimation. However, the differences in age estimates from the three structures in this study emphasize the importance of validating aging structures to provide accurate age estimates for Lake Champlain.