Comparison of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Measures of Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life

Abstract

BackgroundWe studied the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with either Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (hereafter “pharmacomechanical thrombolysis”; PT) or Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MethodsThis retrospective study of data archived between September 2013 and September 2015 was surveyed. Two separate patient populations were identified and analyzed: patients were separated into PT group or CDT group. For up to 5 years post-treatment, the incidence, severity of PTS, and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score difference were compared. ResultsThe study identified 131 patients divided into PT group (65) and CDT group (66). Within the 5-year follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PTS (45.0% PT vs. 57.6% CDT; odds ratio (OR) = 0.602; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.291–1.242; P = 0.201), but there was reduced severe PTS in the PT group (Villalta scale ≥15 or ulcer:11.7% PT vs. 27.1% CDT; OR 0.355; 95%CI 0.134–0.941, P = 0.039; and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) ≥8: 13.3%PT vs. 28.8% CDT; OR 0.380; 95% CI 0.149–0.967, P = 0.045). There was also a larger improvement of venous disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in the PT group at 5 years [(62.89 ± 14.19) vs (56.39 ±15.62), P = 0.036] compared to the CDT group. ConclusionIn patients with acute iliofemoral DVT treated with PT, PT significantly reduced PTS severity scores, and resulted in greater improvement in venous disease-specific QOL. However, the incidence of was not significantly different from that measured in the CDT.