Abstract
In machine learning, the k value in the k-fold cross-validation method significantly affects the performance of the created model. In the studies that have been done, the k value is usually taken as five or ten because these two values are thought to produce average estimates. However, there is no official rule. It has been observed that few studies have been carried out to use different k values in the training of different models. In this study, a performance evaluation was performed on the IncRNA-disease model using various k values (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) and datasets. The obtained results were compared and the most suitable k value for the model was determined. In future studies, it is aimed to carry out a more comprehensive study by increasing the number of data sets.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
