Comparison of outcomes and operative course between septic and aseptic nonunion in long bones.

Abstract

The treatment of nonunion of long bones is difficult particularly in the presence of infection, which often involves staged surgical management. There is limited literature to compare the post operative course and outcomes of patients treated for septic versus aseptic nonunion. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine if a difference exists between the number of surgical procedures, time to union, and rate of successful union for these two groups. A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single tertiary care center. Patients suffering nonunion of the humerus, tibia and femur were included. Patient demographic data and characteristics of the post operative course were collected to include number and reason for repeat operations, antibiotic course, time to union, and development of a successful union. About 28 of 122 patients had septic nonunion. After diagnosis of nonunion, the septic group averaged 3.9 surgeries compared to 1.5 in the aseptic group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of successful union (79.8% versus 85.7%; p = 0.220), though the septic group took 129days longer on average for successful union. (376 versus 247; p = 0.018). Septic nonunion of long bones is associated with the need for significantly more operations as well as time to union, though union rates remain similar. The identification of infection is critical for both the appropriate treatment as well as counseling patients on the expected post operative course.