Abstract
Unsteady shear methods have the potential to generate flow perturbations near the membrane surface, which play an important role in reducing concentration polarisation and fouling tendency. In general, there are two main approaches for generating time-varying flow perturbations: 1) generating oscillations in the bulk flow; or 2) forcing a slip velocity near the membrane surface. This paper presents a detailed comparison study of both approaches by means of two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The results show that both approaches result in significant increases in flux and maximum wall shear at the same disturbance resonant frequency and Reynolds number. This suggests that the mechanism by which the flow perturbations are generated is not as important as the perturbation frequency, in terms of increasing wall shear and permeate flux. However, it is more important to perturb flow near the membrane surface because it reduces energy consumption compared to oscillating flow approach. In addition, this paper confirms that a white noise perturbation can be used to simplify the approach for maximising vortex-shedding-induced mass transfer enhancement, without the need to identify the peak/resonant frequency for the flow in spacer-filled membrane channels at the expense of a higher pressure loss.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.