Abstract
Context: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is associated with many adverse events, which prolong and increase the healthcare cost. Aims: To compare the efficacy of Palanosetron with respect to Granisetron and Ondansetron in prevention of PONV. To study the need of rescue antiemetic and incidence of side effects. Settings and Design: This Prospective, Randomized study was carried out with 150 adult female patients of ASA Grade I & II posted for elective gynecological surgery under GA. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into three groups of 50 patients each. Group O received injection ondansetron 8 mg IV, Group G received Granisetron 2.5 mg IV & Group P received Palanosetron 0.075 mg iv before GA induction. Episodes of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue antiemetic and side effects were observed for 72 hours in postoperative period. Statistical Analysis Used: Graphpad Software with consideration of significant P value Results: Incidence of nausea and vomiting was more with Ondansetron and minimal with Palanosetron with statistical significance of P Lowest incidence of nausea was found with Palanosetron during 3-24 hours postoperatively (P Complete Control of PONV (No PONV, No rescue drug required) was maximum in P group in all hours of study [P Conclusion: Palanosetron is safe, well tolerated and effective than Granisetron and Ondansetron in reducing the incidence of PONV with less need of rescue antiemetics. Key Messages: Palanosetron is proved better antiemetic than granisetron and ondansetron in prevention of PONV. Keywords: General Anaesthesia, Granisetron, Gynaecological surgery, Ondansetron, Palanosetron, Postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call