Abstract

We numerically modeled the process of exposure and development of the calixarene negative resist and ZEP520 positive resist in electron beam lithography (EBL) in order to understand the limitation of nanopatterning of these two resists and to improve the resolution of the patterning. From the calculation of energy deposition distribution (EDD) in resist at various beam diameters, it is obvious that the fine probe beam with a diameter of 2 nm and thin resist should be adopted for formation of very fine dots. The simulation of resist development profile indicates that a dot size of 2 nm with a pitch of 20 nm can even be obtained at a higher critical energy density by using calixarene resist, while it cannot form the small pattern by using the ZEP520 resist because of the capillary force.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call