Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the relative usefulness of multishot turbo spin echo (TSE) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) for determination of optimal breath-hold fast T2-weighted technique in terms of lesion detection, lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image quality. The images of TSE with and without fat suppression (FS) and of HASTE with and without FS were retrospectively reviewed for 49 patients with 128 lesions. Without FS, TSE and HASTE images allowed depiction of focal hepatic masses (112 of 128, sensitivity = 87.5%) at the same rate. TSE with FS depicted more focal lesions (115 of 128, 89.8%) than HASTE with FS (109 of 128, 85.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). The CNR of each lesion on HASTE sequences was greater (P < .01) than that on TSE sequences. The CNR of hemangioma was distinct from that of solid tumors and cystic lesions in all sequences, and the range of CNR in each group of pathologies overlapped less and were well separated in the HASTE sequences. HASTE sequences produced better image quality with fewer artifacts (P < .0001). The results of this study suggest that HASTE sequences allow differentiation between solid tumors, hemangiomas, and cystic lesions in terms of CNR, producing fewer image artifacts, with acceptable sensitivity in lesion detection.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have