Abstract
In this study two different methods of sampling and gas chromatographic (GC) analysis for monoterpenes were compared. Charcoal tubes were analyzed by GC after solvent extraction, and the contents of Tenax tubes were determined by a GC equipped with a cold trap injector. Both methods were tested first in the laboratory and then in a plywood factory. The Tenax cold trap method was found to be much more sensitive than the charcoal method, giving about three times higher monoterpene concentrations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
