Abstract

Abstract. This study compares large-scale dynamical variability in the extratropical stratosphere, such as major stratospheric sudden warmings (MSSWs), among the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) family data sets. The JRA-55 family consists of three products: a standard product (STDD) of the JRA-55 reanalysis data and two sub-products of JRA-55C (CONV) and JRA-55AMIP (AMIP). CONV assimilates only conventional surface and upper-air observations without assimilation of satellite observations, whereas AMIP runs the same numerical weather prediction model without assimilation of observational data. A comparison of the occurrence of MSSWs in Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter shows that, compared to STDD, CONV delays several MSSWs by 1 to 4 days and also misses a few MSSWs. CONV also misses the Southern Hemisphere (SH) MSSW in September 2002. AMIP shows significantly fewer MSSWs in Northern Hemisphere winter and especially lacks MSSWs of the high aspect ratio of the polar vortex in which the vortex is highly stretched or split. A further examination of daily geopotential height differences between STDD and CONV reveals occasional peaks in both hemispheres that are separated from MSSWs. The delayed and missed MSSW cases have smaller height differences in magnitude than such peaks. The height differences for those MSSWs include large contributions from the zonal component, which reflects underestimations in the weakening of the zonal mean polar night jet in CONV. We also explore strong planetary wave forcings and associated polar vortex weakenings for STDD and AMIP. We find a lower frequency of strong wave forcings and weaker vortex responses to such wave forcings in AMIP, consistent with the lower MSSW frequency.

Highlights

  • Large-scale dynamical variability is an important feature in the extratropical stratosphere, especially in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter stratosphere (e.g., Labitzke and van Loon, 1999; Yoden et al, 2002; Waugh and Polvani, 2010)

  • In order to obtain a clue for the difference in the major stratospheric sudden warmings (MSSWs) frequency, we look at extreme planetary wave forcings by identifying a maximum of the poleward heat flux of waves 1–3 for each winter season in standard product (STDD) and AMIP

  • A comparison of MSSWs reveals that CONV reproduces a large part of MSSWs identified in STDD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large-scale dynamical variability is an important feature in the extratropical stratosphere, especially in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter stratosphere (e.g., Labitzke and van Loon, 1999; Yoden et al, 2002; Waugh and Polvani, 2010). Previous studies investigate aspects of such dynamical variability in the extratropical stratosphere using multiple reanalysis data sets. Previous studies investigated some aspects of the JRA-55 family data sets, especially in the stratosphere. This study seeks to compare the climatology and largescale dynamical variability, such as frequency and vortex geometry of SSWs, in the NH and SH extratropical stratosphere among the JRA-55 family data sets. A motivation for this study is that dynamical variability in the extratropical stratosphere remains relatively unexplored in the JRA-55 family data sets, while they provide a good opportunity for a clear comparison owing to their meticulous design.

Data and analysis method
Identification of MSSW onset dates
Calculation of RMSD of geopotential height fields
Calculation of polar vortex geometry
Climatology
Variability
Frequency and vortex geometry of MSSWs in NH
Comparison of CONV to STDD
Climatological RMSD distributions
Case-to-case variability in RMSD and MSSWs in NH
Comparison of AMIP to STDD
Lower MSSW frequency for AMIP
Lack of MSSWs of high AR in AMIP
Summary
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call