Abstract

Objectives: After comparing the operations of the dental hygiene curriculum in Australia, New Zealand, and Korea, this study attempted to find areas for improvement as well as possible complementary aspects in Korea’s curriculum. Methods: To compare the dental hygiene curriculums in Australia, New Zealand, and Korea, four universities in Australia, two universities in New Zealand, and 10 universities in Korea were selected. Results: The curriculums in Australia and New Zealand were operated as integrated education by level, with various subjects that are related to clinical practice. By contrast, in Korea, specific subjects were taught every semester. Conclusions: Through this study, it was confirmed that there is a need to revise the contents of the curriculum to demonstrate the competencies of Korean dental hygienists. It is necessary to conduct an in-depth examination of the direction of dental hygiene education in Korea and discuss the scope of work and competencies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call