Abstract

Gait speed is a measure of general fitness. Changing from usual (UGS) to maximum (MGS) gait speed requires coordinated action of many body systems. Gait speed reserve (GSR) is defined as MGS-UGS. From a shortlist of 88 features across five categories including sociodemographic, cognitive, and physiological, we aimed to find and compare the sets of predictors that best describe UGS, MGS, and GSR. For this, we leveraged data from 3,925 adults aged 50+ from Wave 3 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Features were selected by a histogram gradient boosting regression-based stepwise feature selection pipeline. Each model's feature importance and input-output relationships were explored using TreeExplainer from the Shapely Additive Explanations explainable machine learning package. The mean (SD) from fivefold cross-validation on training data and the score on test data were 0.38 (0.04) and 0.41 for UGS, 0.45 (0.04) and 0.46 for MGS, and 0.19 (0.02) and 0.21 for GSR. Each model selected features across all categories. Features common to all models were age, grip strength, chair stands time, mean motor reaction time, and height. Exclusive to UGS and MGS were educational attainment, fear of falling, Montreal cognitive assessment errors, and orthostatic intolerance. Exclusive to MGS and GSR were body mass index (BMI), and number of medications. No features were selected exclusively for UGS and GSR. Features unique to UGS were resting-state pulse interval, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) depression, sit-to-stand difference in diastolic blood pressure, and left visual acuity. Unique to MGS were standard deviation in sustained attention to response task times, resting-state heart rate, smoking status, total heartbeat power during paced breathing, and visual acuity. Unique to GSR were accuracy proportion in a sound-induced flash illusion test, Mini-mental State Examination errors, and number of cardiovascular conditions. No interactions were present in the GSR model. The four features that overall gave the most impactful interactions in the UGS and MGS models were age, chair stands time, grip strength, and BMI. These findings may help provide new insights into the multisystem predictors of gait speed and gait speed reserve in older adults and support a network physiology approach to their study.

Highlights

  • Gait speed is a measure of general fitness (Wu and Zhao, 2021); faster gait speed is associated with the ability to meet occupational demands in younger adults (Aldridge et al, 2020), whilst slower gait speed is associated with functional decline and morbidity in older adults (Bohannon, 1992; Kawajiri et al, 2019)

  • The selected variables explained a greater proportion of variation in maximum gait speed (MGS) and usual (or comfortable) gait speed (UGS) than gait speed reserve (GSR)

  • It may be useful to focus on ensuring that a patient avoids reaching threshold values that are associated with a rapid decline in gait speed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gait speed is a measure of general fitness (Wu and Zhao, 2021); faster gait speed is associated with the ability to meet occupational demands in younger adults (Aldridge et al, 2020), whilst slower gait speed is associated with functional decline and morbidity in older adults (Bohannon, 1992; Kawajiri et al, 2019). Even though usual (or comfortable) gait speed (UGS) and maximum gait speed (MGS) are significantly intercorrelated (Kollen et al, 2006), changing from comfortable to maximum speed requires a general effort across many body systems. The difference between these two gait speeds has been referred to as walking speed reserve or gait speed reserve (GSR) (Noguerón García et al, 2020). The health associations of these three modalities of gait speed (UGS, MGS, and GSR) are somewhat different, but to our knowledge, there have been no systematic attempts to model predictors of GSR in a large representative sample of community-dwelling older adults where many demographic, anthropometric, and clinical features are measured across multiple physiological systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call