Comparison of different variant sequence types coupled with decoy generation methods used in concatenated target-decoy database searches for proteogenomic research

Abstract

Concatenated target-decoy database searches are commonly used in proteogenomic research for variant peptide identification. Currently, protein-based and peptide-based sequence databases are applied to store variant sequences for database searches. The protein-based database records a full-length wild-type protein sequence but using the given variant events to replace the original amino acids, whereas the peptide-based database retains only the in silico digested peptides containing the variants. However, the performance of applying various decoy generation methods on the peptide-based variant sequence database is still unclear, compared to the protein-based database. In this paper, we conduct a thorough comparison on target-decoy databases constructed by the above two types of databases coupled with various decoy generation methods for proteogenomic analyses. The results show that for the protein-based variant sequence database, using the reverse or the pseudo reverse method achieves similar performance for variant peptide identification. Furthermore, for the peptide-based database, the pseudo reverse method is more suitable than the widely used reverse method, as shown by identifying 6% more variant PSMs in a HEK293 cell line data set. SignificanceIn our survey of publications on proteogenomic studies, 57% of the studies adopt the peptide-based variant sequence database coupled with the reverse method for decoy generation to construct a target-decoy database for searches. However, our results show that when using the peptide-based variant sequence database, it is better to adopt the pseudo reverse method for generating decoy sequences, to avoid leading to fewer variant peptides being identified.