Comparison of Contemporary In Situ, Model, and Satellite Remote Sensing Soil Moisture With a Focus on Drought Monitoring

Abstract

AbstractSoil moisture is a key drought indicator; however, current in situ soil moisture infrastructure is inadequate for large‐scale drought monitoring. One initiative of the ongoing National Soil Moisture Network program is the development of a near real‐time drought monitoring product that integrates in situ, model, and satellite remote sensing data. Data integration from diverse sources requires large‐scale validation prior to integration. This study develops a framework for assessing the fidelity of in situ, model, and satellite soil moisture data sets. Here we evaluate data from over 100 in situ monitoring stations that are part of nine monitoring networks; North American Land Data Assimilation System Phase 2 and Climate Prediction Center land surface models; and Soil Moisture Active‐Passive, Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity, and European Space Agency‐Climate Change Initiative (ESA‐CCI) satellite products. The results indicate the majority of in situ stations exhibit low error variance and are spatially representative; however, some networks and individual stations exhibit anomalously high error variance or are sited in a way that make them not spatially representative of a larger area. Overall, North American Land Data Assimilation System Phase 2 is the modeled product that consistently performed best, and Soil Moisture Active‐Passive L3 is the remotely sensed product that consistently performed the best. They were able to both capture in situ soil moisture variability and provide an accurate depiction of drought conditions. The methods and verification framework applied in this study can be used to evaluate any soil moisture data set in any region of the world.