Comparison of classical and abinitio simulations of hydronium and aqueous proton transfer.

Abstract

Proton transport in aqueous systems occurs by making and breaking covalent bonds, a process that classical force fields cannot reproduce. Various attempts have been made to remedy this deficiency, by valence bond theory or instantaneous proton transfers, but the ability of such methods to provide a realistic picture of this fundamental process has not been fully evaluated. Here we compare an abinitio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation of an excess proton in water to a simulation of a classical H3O+ in TIP3P water. The energy gap upon instantaneous proton transfer from H3O+ to an acceptor water molecule is much higher in the classical simulation than in the AIMD configurations evaluated with the same classical potential. The origins of this discrepancy are identified by comparing the solvent structures around the excess proton in the two systems. One major structural difference is in the tilt angle of the water molecules that accept an hydrogen bond from H3O+. The lack of lone pairs in TIP3P produces a tilt angle that is too large and generates an unfavorable geometry after instantaneous proton transfer. This problem can be alleviated by the use of TIP5P, which gives a tilt angle much closer to the AIMD result. Another important factor that raises the energy gap is the different optimal distance in water-water vs H3O+-water H-bonds. In AIMD the acceptor is gradually polarized and takes a hydronium-like configuration even before proton transfer actually happens. Ways to remedy some of these problems in classical simulations are discussed.