Abstract

Urban land use/cover and efficiency are important indicators of the degree of urbanization. However, research about comparing their changes at the megaregion level is relatively rare. In this study, we depicted the differences and inequalities of urban land and efficiency among megaregions in China using China’s Land Use/cover Dataset (CLUD) and China’s Urban Land Use/cover Dataset (CLUD-Urban). Furthermore, we analyzed regional inequality using the Theil index. The results indicated that the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area had the highest proportion of urban land (8.03%), while the Chengdu-Chongqing Megaregion had the highest proportion of developed land (64.70%). The proportion of urban impervious surface area was highest in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area (75.16%) and lowest in the Chengdu-Chongqing Megaregion (67.19%). Furthermore, the highest urban expansion occurred in the Yangtze River Delta (260.52 km2/a), and the fastest period was 2000–2010 (298.19 km2/a). The decreasing Theil index values for the urban population and economic density were 0.305 and 1.748, respectively, in 1980–2015. This study depicted the development trajectory of different megaregions, and will expect to provide a valuable insight and new knowledge on reasonable urban growth modes and sustainable goals in urban planning and management.

Highlights

  • Numerous studies characterize urban land changes and their ecological effects in different regions

  • Five major megaregions were selected at the national level for analysis (Table 1, Figure 1), including the Beijing (Jing)-Tianjin (Jin)-Hebei (Ji) Megaregion (JJJ), Yangtze River Delta Megaregion (YRD), Guangdong (Yue)-Hong Kong (Gang)-Macao (Ao) Great Bay Area (YGA), Middle Yangtze River Megaregion (MYR) and Chengdu (Cheng)-Chongqing (Yu) Megaregion (CY)

  • The degrees of artificial construction intensity are shown as the Urban area percentage (UAP), developed land percentage (DAP) and Impervious surface area percentage (ISP) (Figures 3 and 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous studies characterize urban land changes and their ecological effects in different regions. Numerous studies have been conducted on urban land characterization, such as urban area [25], urban expansion [26,27], urban land landscape patterns [28,29,30], urban land density [31], urban internal structure [32,33,34] and urban land efficiency [35,36,37]. The population and economic production relative to the unit area of the city can reflect the differences in urban land use efficiency. These studies generally depict urban megaregions using indexes in only one respect. This study performed a comparative analysis of changes in urban land use/cover and efficiency in megaregions in China from 1980 to 2015. This study depicted the differences and inequalities among different megaregions of China, which may help implement the National New-Type Urbanization Plan in China [48,49] and is critical to achieving sustainable urban development [50,51]

Study Area
Data and Methods
Acquirement of Social-Economic Factors
Quantification of Urban Land and Its Efficiency Change
Characterization of Regional Divergence of Urban Land Efficiency
Different Degrees of Artificial Construction Intensity
Comparison of Urban Expansion Among Chinese Megaregions
Quantifying the Inequality of Urban Land and Efficiency
DDiissccuussssiioonn
Differences of the Change of Efficiency Indexes
Differently Developing Trajectories of Megaregions
Driving Forces of Urbanization for Different Megaregions
Inequality Changes from the Theil Index
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.