Abstract

Abstract: The supply chain performance evaluation is a critical activity to continuously improve operations. Literature presents several performance evaluation systems based on multi-criteria methods and artificial intelligence. Among them, the systems based on artificial neural networks (ANN) excel due to their capacity of modeling non-linear relationships between metrics and allowing adaptations to a specific environment by means of historical performance data. These systems’ accuracy depend directly on the adopted training algorithm, and no studies have been found that assess the efficiency of these algorithms when applied to supply chain performance evaluation. In this context, the present study evaluates four ANNs learning methods in order to investigate which one is the most adequate to deal with supply chain evaluation. The algorithms tested were Gradient Descendent Momentum, Levenberg-Marquardt, Quasi-Newton and Scale Conjugate Gradient. The performance metrics were extracted from SCOR®, which is a reference model used worldwide. The random sub-sampling cross-validation method was adopted to find the most adequate topological configuration for each model. A set of 80 topologies was implemented using MATLAB®. The prediction accuracy evaluation was based on the mean square error. For the four level 1 metrics considered, the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm provided the most precise results. The results of correlation analysis and hypothesis tests reinforce the accuracy of the proposed models. Furthermore, the proposed computational models reached a prediction accuracy higher than previous approaches.

Highlights

  • Mentzer et al (2001) define supply chain management as “the strategic and systematic coordination of business traditional functions and tactical actions in a company and through its businesses along the chain,” aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of member companies

  • The input variables are defined by the level 2 SCOR® metrics, while the output variables refer to the level 1 SCOR® metrics

  • Chart 2 describes briefly these metrics. More details about these metrics can be consulted in the SCOR® model (SCC, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mentzer et al (2001) define supply chain management as “the strategic and systematic coordination of business traditional functions and tactical actions in a company and through its businesses along the chain,” aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of member companies. In the case of approaches based on pairwise comparison as proposed by Clivillé & Berrah (2012), Yang & Jiang (2012), Kocaoğlu et al (2013), Bukhori et al (2015), Sellitto et al (2015) and Dissanayake & Cross (2018), the greater the metrics and supply chain considered in the evaluation, the greater the difficulty in ensuring data consistency Another problem of the models based on multicriteria methods (Golparvar & Seifbarghy, 2009; Kocaoğlu et al, 2013; Moharamkhani et al, 2017; Akkawuttiwanich & Yenradee, 2018) is that they generate an output value based on a weighted linear combination of input values. Method(s) TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) Mamdani Inference Fuzzy System DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) and PROMETHEE II MACBETH

Multilayer perceptron neural networks
Training algorithms
Research method
Results and discussion
Definition of topological configuration and training parameters
The learning process results
Validation of results using the hypothesis tests
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call