Abstract

A broth microdilution and a reference agar dilution method was used to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of five veterinary antimicrobials when tested against 96 animal-derived and six American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains of Clostridium perfringens. These antimicrobials [bacitracin methylenedisalicylate (bacitracin-MD), tylosin, virginiamycin, erthromycin and tetracycline] are approved for use in animal feed at different levels for growth enhancement, control, and treatment of a variety of enteric diseases. For bacitracin-MD, MICs were higher using the broth microdilution method when compared to the agar dilution method. The two methods had the lowest agreement when using bacitracin-MD compared to the method agreements of other antimicrobials tested (only 34.3% of the C. perfringens tested within ±1 doubling dilution). Tylosin MICs were lower by the broth microdilution method but had better agreement between methods with 75.5% of the C. perfringens tested within ±1 doubling dilution. Good correlation between methods was found for virginiamycin, tetracycline, and erythromycin with 85.3, 76.5, 81.4% of the C. perfringens tested within ±1 doubling dilution, respectively. Differences in susceptibility to individual antimicrobials were found among the avian and porcine strains by both methods. For avian strains, bacitracin-MD, tylosin, and erthromycin MIC90values had differences of at least four doubling dilutions between methods. There were biases toward higher bacitracin-MD and lower tylosin and erythromycin MIC90values using the broth microdilution method. MIC90values against porcine and ATCC strains were more comparable between methods for all five antimicrobials than those generated against avian strains but the biases were still present. Most animal-derived strains were inhibited by approved livestock feed levels of the antimicrobials. Caution should be used when evaluating the potential effectiveness of feed-based antimicrobials against C. perfringens when results are generated using an in vitro test that may not be in agreement with the reference agar dilution method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.