Abstract

Abstract. This study compares performance of aerial image based point clouds (IPCs) and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) based point clouds in detection of thinnings and clear cuts in forests. IPCs are an appealing method to update forest resource data, because of their accuracy in forest height estimation and cost-efficiency of aerial image acquisition. We predicted forest changes over a period of three years by creating difference layers that displayed the difference in height or volume between the initial and subsequent time points. Both IPCs and LiDAR data were used in this process. The IPCs were constructed with the Semi-Global Matching (SGM) algorithm. Difference layers were constructed by calculating differences in fitted height or volume models or in canopy height models (CHMs) from both time points. The LiDAR-derived digital terrain model (DTM) was used to scale heights to above ground level. The study area was classified in logistic regression into the categories ClearCut, Thinning or NoChange with the values from the difference layers. We compared the predicted changes with the true changes verified in the field, and obtained at best a classification accuracy for clear cuts 93.1 % with IPCs and 91.7 % with LiDAR data. However, a classification accuracy for thinnings was only 8.0 % with IPCs. With LiDAR data 41.4 % of thinnings were detected. In conclusion, the LiDAR data proved to be more accurate method to predict the minor changes in forests than IPCs, but both methods are useful in detection of major changes.

Highlights

  • Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and aerial images are widely used data sources in forest inventories

  • We evaluate the accuracy of image based point clouds (IPCs)-based forest change detection in comparison with LiDAR based change detection

  • When thinnings and clear cuts were compared with the true changes verified in the field (Table 4) by using height and volume model based method, we obtained a stand level classification accuracy for clear cuts being 79.2% with IPCs, but only 8.0% for thinnings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and aerial images are widely used data sources in forest inventories. With LiDAR data it is possible to obtain very accurate estimates for height-dependent stand variables (Hyyppä et al, 2008; Lim et al, 2003; Wulder et al, 2012). In Finland, LiDAR data is acquired by Finnish Forest Centre and National Land Survey of Finland (NLS) at intervals of ten years (Maltamo et al, 2011). Collecting point clouds with LiDAR technology is somewhat expensive whereupon more cost-effective alternatives to generate 3D point clouds are appealing. There can be need to update forest data in more often than every tenth year when new LiDAR data is collected.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call