Comparison of 1-year surgical outcomes of combined cataract surgery and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) versus cataract surgery and iStent Inject.

Abstract

Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complication rates of phacoemulsification cataract surgery when combined with either gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or iStent Inject. This is a retrospective case-control study to compare the surgical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification cataract surgery with either GATT (phaco-GATT) or iStent Inject (phaco-iStent). Both groups had at least 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome measures were IOP and number of glaucoma medications (NGMs) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intra- or postoperative complications within the first year of follow-up. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) < 21 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction in IOP at 1 year regardless of the NGM. Each group included 37 patients. The median baseline IOP (24 vs 17) and NGM (3 vs 2) were higher in the phaco-GATT group (p < 0.001). Phaco-GATT achieved a 38% (p < 0.0001) reduction in IOP compared to 13.2% (p < 0.001) in the phaco-iStent group at 1-year follow-up. The reduction in IOP and NGM was significantly higher in the phaco-GATT group (p < 0.01). After adjusting for baseline IOP, the reduction in IOP at 12 months was still significantly higher in the phaco-GATT group (p = 0.042). At 1 year, 86.4% of patients in the phaco-GATT group met the success criteria compared to 35.1% in the phaco-iStent group. Safety outcomes were slightly favourable in the phaco-iStent group. Phaco-GATT and phaco-iStent showed a significant reduction in IOP and NGM, with phaco-GATT having a significantly higher reduction. Phaco-iStent appears to have a higher safety profile and is probably preferable in monocular patients and those with a high risk of bleeding.