Abstract
Objective A comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery of intracranial hematoma and conservative treatment for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods 210 cases of HICH were randomized into the observation group (receiving minimally invasive intracranial hematoma dissection ) and the control group (receiving conservative treatment), the total efficiency of this two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group (90.48%)was higher than that of the control group (48.57%) (P<0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery for HICH treatment could improve the total efficiency of treatment and daily living. Key words: Minimally invasive surgery of intracranial hematoma; Conservative treatment; Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage; Efficiency
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call