Comparing Wise Pattern to Non-Wise Pattern Skin Sparing Mastectomy: A Critical Evaluation of Patient Demographics and Surgical Outcomes.

Abstract

Multiple skin-sparing incisions are utilized in immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction; however, the Wise pattern incision (WPI) may have superior cosmetic outcomes for large ptotic breasts compared to non-Wise pattern incisions (NWPI). We evaluated patient demographics and surgical outcomes with WPI versus NWPI. An electronic medical record search was performed for patients at a single academic institution from 2019 to 2022 with ICD-10-CM diagnosis code "Z42.1: encounter for breast reconstruction following mastectomy." Retrospective chart review evaluated patient demographics, intraoperative factors, postoperative complications, and surgical cost. 288 patients were included; 58 had WPI and 230 had NWPI. Median BMI differed between WPI (30.5) and NWPI (26.4) (P < 0.001). 57% of WPI had preoperative grade 3 ptosis versus 23% of NWPI (P < 0.001). No difference was found in median operative times (WPI: 219 minutes, NWPI: 194 minutes, P = 0.38). Overall rates of postoperative complications differed between WPI (62%) and NWPI (45%) on univariate, but not multivariate, analysis. Median total surgery charge was higher for WPI (WPI: $36,223, NWPI: $31,185, P < 0.001), while implant cost was higher for NWPI (WPI: $2,700, NPWI: $8,040, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in operative time, overall complication rate, or charge between incision types once adjusted for confounding factors. The higher complication rate in the WPI group was likely driven by higher BMI, a known risk factor for surgical complications regardless of approach. Surgeons can consider WPI as a noninferior option for patients with higher BMI and ptosis.