Abstract
Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavities. Methods: Box-cavities (class-II) on the distal and mesial surfaces of extracted (premolar) teeth were prepared with a gingival margin placed 1mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth with prepared class II cavities were randomly divided into four study groups according to the type of restorative materials (conventional RBC; bulk-fill RBC; conventional RBC lined with flowable RBC and conventional RBC lined with resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (GIC) as open sandwich-technique). Each group was further subdivided into a total-etch subgroup in which a separate etching step was performed before applying the bonding agent and a self-etch subgroup in which a self-etch adhesive system was used (n = 10). For each group, cavities were restored using the respective restorative materials and techniques, subjected to 1000 thermocycles, and placed in the methylene-blue dye. The specimen teeth were sectioned for further microscopic examination for micro-leakage. Results: The least dye penetration values were reported for group 4 (GIC) followed by the group Bulk-fill using the self-etch adhesive system (group 2b). The highest dye penetration was reported for the group Bulk-fill using the total-etch adhesive system (2a), followed by the group conventional RBC using the total-etch adhesive system). The total-etch adhesive system had significantly greater micro-leakage compared to the self-etch adhesive system (1a) (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system significantly reduced the micro-leakage compared to the total-etch system. Bulk-fill RBC when bonded with the self-etch adhesive provided good marginal sealing ability comparable to open sandwich-technique using GIC.
Highlights
There was no significant difference between the glass-ionomers group and the Bulkfil RBC group when used with self-etch adhesive system (p = 0.39) Adding a flowable
RBC liner under regular RBC reduces the micro-leakage compared to regular RBC without liner, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.59)
The present study investigated the ability of various polymeric dental adhesives and techniques in terms of sealing deep margins in class-II cavities
Summary
Patient awareness toward cosmetic restorations has increased, tooth-colored restorations have become the most demanding restorations both in anterior as well as posterior regions of the oral cavity. Adhesive properties with smaller cavity size and improvement in the strength of remaining tooth structure, RBCs restorations are better as compared to conventionally used amalgam restorations. RBCs do not need retention and resistance form and are considered suitable material for direct restorations [1,2]. The longevity of the RBCs restorations remains a major concern. Compared to the amalgam restorations, the failure rate of RBCs is higher in terms of postoperative sensitivity and caries (secondary) mainly caused by micro-leakage especially at the cervical margin of deep cavities [3,4,5]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have