Comparing Multicarrier Ambiguity Resolution Methods for Geometry‐Based GPS and Galileo Relative Positioning and Their Application to Low Earth Orbiting Satellite Attitude Determination

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of several GNSS multicarrier ambiguity (MCAR) resolution techniques for the purpose of attitude determination of low earth orbiting satellites (LEOs). It is based on the outcomes of the study performed by the University of Calgary and financed by the European 6th Framework Programme for Research and Development as part of the research project PROGENY. The existing MCAR literature is reviewed and eight possible variations of the general MCAR processing scheme are identified based on two possible options for the mathematical model of the float solution, two options for the estimation technique used for the float solution, and finally two possible options for the ambiguity resolution process. The two most promising methods, geometry‐based filtered cascading and geometry‐based filtered LAMBDA, are analysed in detail for two simulated users modelled after polar orbiting LEOs through an extensive covariance simulation. Both the proposed Galileo constellation and Galileo used in conjunction with the GPS constellation are tested and results are presented in terms of probabilities of correct ambiguity resolution and float and fixed solution baseline accuracies. The LAMBDA algorithm is shown to outperform the cascading method, particularly in the single‐frequency dual‐GNSS system case. Secondly, more frequencies and multiple GNSS always offer improvement, but the single‐frequency dual‐system case is found to have similar performance to the dual‐frequency single‐system case.