Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual-chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure

Abstract

To determine whether survival following permanent ventricular demand pacing differs from survival following permanent dual-chamber pacing in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction (unexplained sinus bradycardia, subsidiary rhythms, sinus arrest, sinoatrial block, or the bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome), we followed 79 patients who received a VVI pacemaker (group 1) and 49 patients who received a DVI or DDD pacemaker (group 2) for 1 to 5 years. There was no significant difference in sex distribution, mean age, or the incidence of coronary heart disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, or renal failure between groups 1 and 2. Overall, the predicted cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 89%, 82%, and 74%, respectively, for group 1 and 94%, 86%, and 78%, respectively, for group 2. In patients with preexistent congestive heart failure (CHF), predicted cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 78%, 69%, and 57%, respectively, for group 1 (n = 23) and 90%, 83%, and 75%, respectively, for group 2 (n = 16). Five-year predicted cumulative survival was significantly lower in group 1 patients with CHF than in group 2 patients with CHF ( p < 0.03). There was no significant difference in 5-year cumulative survival rates between groups 1 and 2 in patients without CHF. The results suggest that permanent dual-chamber pacing enhances survival to a greater extent than permanent ventricular demand pacing in patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction and CHF.