Abstract
This paper presents a comparison between three continuum-based topology optimization methods: the hybrid cellular automaton method, the optimality criteria method, and the method of moving asymptotes. The purpose of the study is to highlight the differences between the three. The optimality criteria method and the method of moving asymptotes are well established in topology optimization. The hybrid cellular automaton method is a recently developed gradient-free technique that combines both local design rules based on the cellular automaton paradigm and the finite element analysis. The closed-loop controllers used in the hybrid cellular automaton method are used to modify the mass distribution in the design domain to find an optimum material layout. The hybrid cellular automaton and optimality criteria methods and the method of moving asymptotes are described and applied in a comparative study to three sample problems. The influence of different algorithm control parameters is shown in this work. The paper demonstrates that, for the sample problems presented, the hybrid cellular automaton method generally required the fewest number of iterations to converge to a solution compared with the optimality criteria method and the method of moving asymptotes. The final topologies generated using the hybrid cellular automaton method typically had the lowest compliance and exhibited the fewest number of intermediate densities at the solution.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
