Abstract
The rock mass failure induced by high in‐situ stresses during the excavation of deep diversion tunnels is one of the key problems in the construction of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Based on the results of acoustic wave tests and rockburst statistical analysis conducted, this study focuses on the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) and rockburst events in the Jinping II diversion tunnels excavated using the tunnel boring machine (TBM) method and the drilling‐blasting method. The unloading failure mechanism and the rockburst induced by the two different excavation methods were compared and analyzed. The results indicate that, due to the different stress adjustment processes, the degree of damage to the surrounding rock mass excavated using the drilling‐blasting method was more serious than that using the TBM method. The EDZ induced by the TBM was usually distributed evenly along the edge of the excavation surface. While, the drilling‐blasting method was more likely to cause stress concentration, resulting in a deeper EDZ in local areas. However, the TBM excavation method can cause other problems in high in‐situ stress areas, such as strong rockbursts. The drilling‐blasting method is more prone to structural controlled failure of the surrounding rock mass, while the TBM method would induce high stress concentration near the edge of excavation and more widely distributed of stress adjustment induced failure. As a result, the scale and frequency of the rockburst events generated by the TBM were significantly greater than those caused by the drilling‐blasting method during the excavation of Jinping II diversion tunnels. The TBM method should be used carefully for tunnel excavation in high in‐situ stress areas with burial depths of greater than 2000 m. If it is necessary to use the TBM method after a comprehensive selection, it is suggested that equipment adaptability improvement, advanced prediction, and prediction technology be used.
Highlights
Academic Editor: Fengqiang Gong e rock mass failure induced by high in-situ stresses during the excavation of deep diversion tunnels is one of the key problems in the construction of the Jinping II Hydropower Station
Based on the results of acoustic wave tests and rockburst statistical analysis conducted, this study focuses on the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) and rockburst events in the Jinping II diversion tunnels excavated using the tunnel boring machine (TBM) method and the drilling-blasting method. e unloading failure mechanism and the rockburst induced by the two different excavation methods were compared and analyzed. e results indicate that, due to the different stress adjustment processes, the degree of damage to the surrounding rock mass excavated using the drilling-blasting method was more serious than that using the TBM method. e EDZ induced by the TBM was usually distributed evenly along the edge of the excavation surface
If it is necessary to use the TBM method after a comprehensive selection, it is suggested that equipment adaptability improvement, advanced prediction, and prediction technology be used
Summary
In order to further illustrate the different effects of the TBM method and the drilling-blasting method on the unloading damage to the rock mass surrounding the diversion tunnels, the acoustic wave velocities in the surrounding rock mass near three typical test sections (K14 + 500 m, k15 + 200 m, and k15 + 600 m) of water diversion tunnels 1#–4# were acquired. It can be seen that the EDZs in the surrounding rock mass caused by the drilling-blasting method (water diversion tunnels 2# and 4#) are significantly greater in the left and right arch foots than those in the crown and sidewalls (e.g., Figures 6(d), 6(j), and 6(l)), and the deepest EDZ reached 4.8 m, while those caused by the TBM method (water diversion tunnels 1# and 3#) are evenly distributed along the edge of the excavation surface. Since the stress adjustment lasts for a long time, the stress concentration is relieved, and the unloading damage is relatively small
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
