Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of discrete proportional integral (PI) and proportional resonant (PR) current control for single-phase uninterruptible power supply (UPS) inverters. There is an increasing requirement for current and voltage-controlled UPS inverters with very low or zero steady-state error, improved transient response and lower total harmonic distortion (THD). The most promising type of current regulator for single-phase inverters is PR control because it can introduce an infinite gain at a selected resonance frequency such as the fundamental frequency to eliminate the steady-state error, which cannot be achieved by well-known proportional integral (PI) control. Note that PI control has limitations in terms of the steady-state magnitude and phase errors. In addition, PI control also has limited harmonic rejection capability, unlike the PR control, also can compensate for low-order harmonics. Imperfections in the current and voltage control scheme results in higher harmonic distortion of the output current and voltage. In this paper, performance of PR control parameters ($K_{p}$ , $K_{i}$ , and $\omega _{c}$ ) and filter parameters ($L_{f}$ and $C_{f}$ ) are optimally tuned to obtain a very low THD current with reduced output voltage ripple and steady-state error. The analysis, design and implementation of both PI and PR current control in single-phase UPS inverter applications through simulations and experiments are also presented in this paper. The performance of both of these control schemes are analyzed in terms of steady-state response, transient response, and level of current harmonics.

Highlights

  • Present day uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs) are most popular due to clean power delivery to the varying load in all grid conditions

  • Linear control techniques, such as proportional integral (PI) control, repetitive control (RC) and proportional resonant (PR) control have been implemented in various power converters especially when tracking a sinusoidal signal for single-phase converters [5], [27]

  • When using the PI controller, FFT analysis on the load current yields a total harmonic distortion (THD) value of 6.43% as shown in Figure 11 (b), whereas FFT analysis on the load current yields a THD value of 4.88% using by the PR controller. These results indicate that the current harmonics have been well suppressed by the PR controller as shown in Figure 12 (b)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Present day uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs) are most popular due to clean power delivery to the varying load in all grid conditions. Hysteresis category switching has been considered for each leg of the inverter, resulting in further hardware complexity [26] Linear control techniques, such as proportional integral (PI) control, repetitive control (RC) and proportional resonant (PR) control have been implemented in various power converters especially when tracking a sinusoidal signal for single-phase converters [5], [27]. Note that PR control can achieve a large gain around the resonance frequency spectrum, depending on the value of resonance gain Kr [31] whilst improving the system stability This paper considers both PI and PR current control techniques, focusing on single-phase UPS inverter systems. Note that IL is the filter current through the inductor, IC is the filter current through the capacitor, and Io is the output current through the resistor

CURRENT CONTROL USING PI AND PR CONTROLLERS
CONTROLLERS TUNING USING AUTO OPTIMIZATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF PI CONTROLLER USING
VIII. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call