Comparative Personality Traits Assessment of Three Species of Communally Housed Captive Penguins

Giovanni Quintavalle Pastorino,Silvia Mazzola,Giulio Curone,Massimo Faustini,Lorna Moffat,Dawn Nicoll,Romain Pizzi,Mariangela Albertini,Richard Preziosi

doi:10.3390/ani9060376

Abstract

Simple SummaryThe evolution of modern zoo structures frequently includes enclosures in which different species are hosted, living together permanently. This choice involves positive aspects, both for visitors and for hosted animals. On the other hand, the space available to animals and the standardization of management procedures may not be sufficiently adequate to allow the behavioral individuality to be maintained. This study aimed to verify, in a colony of three species of penguins living together; if individuals express personality traits, that differ among species. The results we obtained show that the penguins exhibited common personality traits, but also that some were expressed with a different intensity, depending on the specie. From a practical point of view, these data could help the management of the animals, allowing to optimize the design of enclosures and the enrichment strategy according to the different behavioral characteristics of the cohabiting species, in order to match with the needs of the individual.Understanding animal personalities has notable implications in the ecology and evolution of animal behavior, but personality studies can also be useful in optimizing animal management, with the aim of improving health and well-being, and optimizing reproductive success, a fundamental factor in the species threatened with extinction. Modern zoos are increasingly being structured with enclosures that host different species, which permanently share spaces. This condition has undeniable positive aspects, but, in some species, it could determine the appearance of collective or synchronized behaviors. The aim of this study was to verify, in a colony of three species of communally housed penguins (Pygoscelis papua, Aptenodytes patagonicus and Eudyptes moseleyi), through a trait-rating assessment, if interspecific group life impacts on the expression of personality traits, and if it is possible to highlight specie-specific expression of personality traits, despite the influence of forced cohabitation. For many of the personality traits we analyzed, we have observed that it was possible to detect an expression that differed, according to the species. From a practical point of view, these data could ameliorate the management of the animals, allowing to design animal life routines, according to the different behavioral characteristics of the cohabiting species.

Highlights

Animal personality, defined as behavioral differences between individuals that are consistent over time and across contexts [1], is one of the most emerging subjects in behavioral research [2].Many authors agree to consider differences in animal personality as the result of adaptive evolutionary processes [3] and to occur in a wide range of taxa [4,5]
And 2 are reported the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (CA), which express the reliability of keepers’ ratings, along with their strength and the statistical significance. These coefficients are calculated in order to highlight the agreement between two or more evaluators, and their values are classified on the basis of their “strength” as follows: 0.9—excellent agreement (E)
An increasing body of evidence indicates that keeper ratings are both reliable and valid, and there is little body of evidence indicates that keeper ratings are both reliable and valid, and there is little evidence supporting the contention that ratings are tainted by anthropomorphism [29]

Summary

Introduction

Animal personality, defined as behavioral differences between individuals that are consistent over time and across contexts [1], is one of the most emerging subjects in behavioral research [2]. Many authors agree to consider differences in animal personality as the result of adaptive evolutionary processes [3] and to occur in a wide range of taxa [4,5]. Research into animal personality has grown over the last decade as its relevance to animal health and welfare has become more apparent [7]. For wildlife management, determining inter-species differences in the personality traits of communally housed animals could be of great help to optimize the use of resources, in order to improve animal welfare [12]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion