Abstract

Microbial Desalination Cell (MDC) represents an innovative technology which accomplishes simultaneous desalination and wastewater treatment without external energy input. MDC technology could be employed to provide freshwater with low-energy input, for example, in remote areas where organic wastes (i.e. urban or industrial) are available. In addition, MDC technology has been proposed as pre-treatment in conventional reverse osmosis plants, with the aim of saving energy and avoiding greenhouse gases related to conventional desalination processes. The use of oxygen reduction (i.e. O2 + 2H2O +4e-  4 OH-, E0’ = 0.815 V, pH=7) was usually implemented as cathodic reaction in most of the MDCs reported in literature, whereas other strategies based on liquid catholytes have been also proposed, for example, ferro-ferricyanide redox couple (i.e. Fe(CN)63- + 1e-  Fe(CN)64-, E0 = 0.37 V). As the MDC designs in the literature and operation modes (i.e. batch, continuous, semi-continuous, etc.) are quite different, the available MDC studies are not directly comparable. For this reason, the main objective of this work was to have a proper comparison of two similar MDCs operating with two different catholyte strategies, and compare performance and desalination efficiencies. In this sense, this study compares the desalination performance of two laboratory-scale MDCs located in two different locations for brackish water and sea water using two different strategies. The first strategy consisted of an air cathode for efficient oxygen reduction, while the second strategy was based on a liquid catholyte with Fe3+/Fe2+ solution (i.e. ferro-ferricyanide complex). Both strategies achieved desalination efficiency above 90% for brackish water. Nominal desalination rates (NDR) were in the range of 0.17-0.14 L·m-2·h-1 for brackish and seawater with air diffusion cathode MDC, respectively, and 1.5-0.7 L·m-2·h-1 when using ferro-ferricyanide redox MDC. Organic matter present in wastewater was effectively removed at 0.9 and 1.1 kg COD·m-3·day-1 using the air diffusion cathode MDC for brackish and sea water, respectively, and 7.1 and 19.7 kg COD·m-3·day-1 with a ferro-ferricyanide redox MDC. Both approaches used a laboratory MDC prototype without any energy supply (excluding pumping energy). Pros and cons of both strategies are discussed for subsequent upscaling of MDC technology.

Highlights

  • More than 700 million people worldwide do not have access to enough clean water and the number is expected to rise up to 1.8 billion people in the decade (Talbot, 2015)

  • Microbial Desalination Cell constitutes an innovative technology where microbial fuel cells and electrodialysis merge in the same device for obtaining fresh water with no energy-associated costs, while treating wastewater and producing energy

  • One of the main limitations for Microbial Desalination Cell (MDC) technology is the low available potential for desalination when oxygen reduction is used as cathodic reaction, as partial desalination is obtained when sea water is used as feed stream

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 700 million people worldwide do not have access to enough clean water and the number is expected to rise up to 1.8 billion people in the decade (Talbot, 2015). The high energy cost continues to be a major concern, with energy consumption accounting for 75% of the desalination operating costs when excluding capital costs, or 40% including capital costs (Elmekawy et al, 2014). This energy cost for desalination is about 10 times higher than for conventional water sources, leading to high water prices. In this context, the most extended desalination technology is reverse osmosis (RO) with an associated energy consumption of 3.5 kWh·m−3 (50% recovery) (MacHarg et al, 2008). Other emerging membrane technologies like forward osmosis (FO), membrane distillation (MD), and capacitive deionization (CDI) have been shown to be only suitable for specific treatment applications (Yuan et al, 2012; Shaffer et al, 2014; Wang and Chung, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call