Abstract

Unemployment, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, is a critical issue for any country as it has economic and social ramifications. Consequently, forecasting unemployment becomes an essential task as it can guide government policy. Time series data are frequently influenced by outliers (unexpected events), and some outliers may exist with extreme observation to reduce the forecasting effectiveness of robust estimators. This study compared the performance of Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) and Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models in modelling and forecasting unemployment rates during the COVID-19 pandemic among the ASEAN-5 countries. These countries include Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia. The monthly unemployment data from January 2010 to December 2021 were applied for all cases, except Thailand, until December 2020. Each adequate model from both forecasting mechanisms underwent forecasting. Their performance was compared based on root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Theil inequality coefficient and symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE). Static forecasting from the ARIMA and SARIMA models was found to perform better than the GARCH model in modelling and forecasting the unemployment rate among ASEAN-5 countries during the pandemic period.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.