Abstract
To compare and evaluate the survival rate, gingival health, and patient acceptance of traditional band and loop (B&L) and company-made B&L space maintainers in deciduous teeth-an in vivo study. A total of 50 patients between 4 and 9 years of age-group, having loss of deciduous first molar in any of the arches, were included in the present study, which was divided into two groups. Group I consisted of the conventional B&L group, and group II consisted of the prefabricated B&L group. The two groups showed no statistical significance in the 1st month, 3rd month, and 6th month in cement loss, failure of soldering, distortion of B&L fracture. The survival rate for the conventional group was 92%, whereas for prefabricated group was 100% at 6 months of follow-up. Company-made B&L showed significantly better gingival health (p = 0.004) at 6 months of follow-up and a better patient's acceptance rate. Prefabricated B&L appliances are newly developed space maintainers that are superior to conventional B&L appliances as they have a higher success rate and are more rational in design. Dutta S, Gupta S, Tripathi P, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Survival Rate Gingival Health and Patient's Acceptance of Conventional Band and Loop and Prefabricated Band and Loop in Primary Teeth: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(S-1):S73-S77.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
