Abstract
Exposure to arsenic-contaminated water poses great health risks to mankind. Nanocomposite beads have been proven to be an effective alternative for large-scale treatment of arsenic-loaded water. The larger size of the beads makes the adsorbent retrieval process less energy-intensive and prevents accidental leaching of nanoparticles into the surrounding environment. Adsorption using macroporous beads is predominantly a diffusion-controlled process. Therefore, in the present study, the shrinking core model (SCM) was used to compare and evaluate the diffusion kinetics of arsenic adsorption using in-situ precipitated iron (oxy)hydroxide alginate (IIAB) and chitosan beads (IICB). Simulated dynamic nondimensional liquid phase arsenic concentration profiles fit well with the experimental data (SSE = 0.018–0.025). External mass transfer coefficient (kf) and effective diffusivity coefficient (De) for both kinds of beads at different initial arsenic concentrations (C0 ∼ 1 mg.L−1 and 5 mg.L−1) were derived. By comparison of diffusivity values and the simulated concentration front profiles, it was observed that chitosan provided a better porous polymer template with more easily accessible adsorption sites covering up to 85 % of the beads’ volume. Comparison with progression conversion models has also been made to test the effectiveness of SCM fitting.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
