Comparative Efficacy of Biodentine® and Calcium Hydroxide in Pulp Capping Treatment

Abstract

Background: This study is focused on — Assessing Biodentine and Calcium hydroxide in indirect pulp capping procedures. Various materials have been used in indirect pulp capping but this comparative study may help appreciate which material produces better results: Biodentine or Calcium hydroxide. Objective: To compare treatment outcomes post indirect pulp capping treatment using Biodentine® and Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) . Materials and Methods: A blinded, randomized clinical control trial involving 50 consenting subjects, comparing Biodentine® (test) and Ca(OH)2 (control). Cavity preparation was done and the cavity was dressed with either Biodentine® or Ca(OH)2 and then restored with Glass ionomer cement. The subjects’ teeth were later examined clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, and 9 months post treatment. The indicators of clinical success were absence of pain, swellings, sinus, fistula, abscess, mobility, tenderness to percussion, normal response to electric pulp tester, and Endo-ice cold test. The indicator of radiographic success was absence of periapical pathosis. The probability level of p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: The success rate at three months was 100% for both groups; at six months, it was 92% for both groups and at nine months, 92% of subjects were successful in the Biodentine® group while the Ca(OH)2 group recorded 88% which was statistically insignificant (P=0.74). Conclusion: Biodentine® and Calcium hydroxide have shown comparable effectiveness in improving treatment outcomes, thus, contributing to the longevity of the teeth, and the period of optimum efficaciousness of the pulp capping materials in this study was three months.