Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare neointima proliferation in three drug-eluting stents (DES) produced by the same company (Balton, Poland) which are covered with a biodegradable polymer and elute sirolimus (concentration: 1.0 and 1.2 µg/mm2), but have different stent platforms and strut thickness: stainless steel Prolim® (115 µm) and BiOSS LIM® (120 µm) and cobalt-chromium Alex® (70 µm). We analyzed data of patients with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 12 months from BiOSS LIM Registry, Prolim Registry and Alex OCT clinical trial. There were 56 patients enrolled, in whom 29 Prolim® stents were deployed, in 11—BiOSS LIM® and in 16—Alex stents. The late lumen loss was the smallest in Prolim® subgroup (0.26 ± 0.17 mm) and did not differ from Alex® subgroup (0.28 ± 0.47 mm). This parameter was significantly bigger in BiOSS® subgroup (0.38 ± 0.19 mm; p < 0.05). In OCT analysis there was no statistically significant difference between Prolim® and Alex® subgroups in terms of mean neointima burden (24.6 ± 8.6 vs. 19.27 ± 8.11%) and neointima volume (28.16 ± 15.10 vs. 24.51 ± 17.64 mm3). In BiOSS® group mean neointima burden (30.9 ± 6.2%) and mean neointima volume (44.9 ± 4.9 mm3) were significantly larger. The morphological analysis revealed that in most cases in all groups the neointima was homogenous with plaque presence only around stent struts. In the QCA and OCT analysis regular DES (Prolim® and Alex®) obtained similar results, whereas more pronounced response from the vessel wall was found in the BiOSS® subgroup.

Highlights

  • Drug eluting stents (DES) reduce the incidence of restenosis and thereby the incidence of repeated revascularizations

  • The aim of this study was to compare neointima proliferation in three DES produced by the same company (Balton, Poland) which are covered with the same biodegradable polymer and elute the same drug but have different stent platforms: stainless steel ­(Prolim®, BiOSS L­ IM®) or cobalt-chromium (­Alex®) and strut thickness: 115, 120 and 70 μm, respectively

  • In the ­Prolim® and BiOSS ­LIM® subgroups most patients presented with multivessel disease and in all groups lesions were of the moderate complexity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drug eluting stents (DES) reduce the incidence of restenosis and thereby the incidence of repeated revascularizations. Most stents were made of stainless steel and had relatively thick struts. Today the world applies the platinum-chromium or cobalt-chromium alloys as the stent platform, what makes possible to produce much thinner struts (even half smaller). The ISAR-STEREO trial demonstrated that a thin-strut stent (≤ 100 μm) had a lower rate of restenosis than a thick strut stent (> 100 μm) of similar design [1]. Comparable results were found in several other trials [2,3,4]. The abovementioned studies suggested that thick struts might predispose to excessive neointima proliferation, these results are based on studies with bare metal stents or the first generation DES presently not available on the market

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call