Abstract

At the beginning of the XX century, bourgeois theorists of artistic culture declared dehumanization as one of the main features of the modernism art, one of the main tasks of the contemporary artists’ artwork. Getting to the scientific understanding of the complex and complicated phenomena of modern art culture, it is necessary to reveal not only the socio-economic reasons for their appearance; the philosophical prerequisites for the development of modern bourgeois art, the ideological orientation of its movements should be identified. In the article, the authors argue that modern bourgeois aesthetics objectively performs the opposite tasks: a) bourgeois art distracts artists and spectators from pressing issues of life, b) imposes ideals and tastes that are advantageous to the bourgeoisie, c) sow pessimism and disbelief in human forces. According to authors, as opposing the personality of society, bourgeois art contributes to the isolation of human from social problems, from issues and tasks of the struggle for a better future. The authors believe that the disclosure of the reactionary ideological essence for the many directions of modern bourgeois art enables a consistent Marxist aesthetic analysis of the content and form of artwork and the principles of bourgeois artists’ creativity. Naturally, the philosophical idealist teachings and aesthetic systems that make up the theoretical foundation of modern bourgeois art, embodied in its various directions not directly but indirectly. Only a Marxist analysis of artistic phenomena and techniques of artistic creation in their correlation with the creative method makes it possible to reveal the true interconnections of these phenomena and the essence of artistic techniques, makes it possible to detect and criticize scientifically based falsification ideas of bourgeois theoreticians of art.

Highlights

  • Art is an integral part of people's lives

  • The authors pursued one goal to prove that: 1) Modern bourgeois aesthetics objectively performs opposite tasks: bourgeois art distracts artists and spectators from pressing issues of life, imposes ideals and tastes that are advantageous to the bourgeoisie, and sows pessimism and disbelief in human powers

  • Using the term “modernism” in a Marxist analysis of contemporary bourgeois art, one should avoid expanding the scope of the concept and not designate contemporary art as a whole; “Modernism” is a local definition of the totality for contemporary art trends based on the formalism method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Art is an integral part of people's lives. Rapid scientific and technological progress has opened up hitherto unprecedented opportunities for the dissemination of culture. “The bourgeois culture of the West cannot be represented as the only and comprehensive phenomenon; in capitalist countries it is opposed by a democratic culture that reflects the genuine interests of the working class and the working masses” (Lapoktysh, 1984). This culture is upheld and supported by the Marxist-Leninist communist and workers parties, all progressive forces. Our art and aesthetics help to know life, actively influence it; Being focused on raising the general cultural level of people, they are an effective means of forming a comprehensively developed personality of a person in a communist formation

Wording of the problem
Cases and their research
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call