Comparative Analysis of Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients Versus Nontransplant Individuals: A Single-Center Study

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHis), a novel agent for management of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), between transplant recipients and nontransplant individuals. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on nondialysis-dependent CKD stage 3 to 5 patients treated with the HIF-PHi roxadustat or daprodustat at a single institution. Patients were categorized as kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and non-KTRs. Efficacy outcomes (hemoglobin and creatinine levels) and safety profiles (rate of adverse events [AEs], descriptions, and discontinuations due to AEs) were assessed 3 months before and 6 months after HIF-PHi initiation within and then between the groups. ResultsThe study comprised 82 patients (KTR: 43, non-KTR: 39). Median ages significantly differed between the KTR (52.7 years) and non-KTR (82.9 years) groups (P < .001). Roxadustat was predominantly used in the KTR group (88.4%), while daprodustat was used in the non-KTR group (94.9%, P < .001). Both groups exhibited significant increases in Hb levels at 1, 3, and 6 months post-HIF-PHi initiation (P for trend, <.001), with a relative increase in Hb level at 6 months of 16% for KTRs and 13% for non-KTRs. Creatinine levels showed no significant changes over 6 months. Although no difference was observed in drug discontinuation due to AEs, the KTR group experienced a significantly higher rate of thrombotic events (18.6 vs 2.6%, P = .049). ConclusionsHIF-PHis demonstrate comparable efficacy for managing anemia in CKD, regardless of transplant status. However, heightened vigilance for thrombosis events is necessary during follow-up for KTRs.