Abstract

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of Leaf Area Index (LAI) estimation using three distinct sources of satellite data: Sentinel-2 imagery, drone imagery (UAVs), and Mohammed VI satellite data. The main objective was to identify the most reliable and precise dataset for predicting LAI, with a focus on evaluating the performance of Random Forest models. For Sentinel-2 imagery, our Random Forest model achieves a robust R-squared (R2) value of 0.89, signifying a strong alignment between predicted and measured LAI values. The associated root-mean-square error (RMSE) is 0.4, indicating high predictive accuracy. In the context of UAVs, our Random Forest model excels, exhibiting an impressive R2 value of 0.93, highlighting a substantial correlation between predicted and measured LAI. The RMSE for drone imagery stands at 0.37, showcasing exceptional predictive accuracy. Finally, the Random Forest model trained on Mohammed VI satellite data yields an R2 value of 0.92, underlining its strong fit with measured LAI values. The RMSE for Mohammed VI imagery is 0.39, further underscoring the model's exceptional predictive accuracy. This comparative analysis underscores the importance of selecting the most suitable satellite data source for LAI estimation in Argania spinosa. UAV imagery emerges as the most accurate choice, closely followed by Mohammed VI Satellite and Sentinel-2 imagery. These findings offer valuable insights for effective monitoring of Argania spinosa and advancing sustainable land management practices in rural ecosystems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call