Abstract
Abstract. We conduct Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) to compare the ability of future satellite measurements of atmospheric methane columns (TROPOMI, GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) for constraining methane emissions down to the 25 km scale through inverse analyses. The OSSE uses the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (0.25∘×0.3125∘ grid resolution) in a 1-week simulation for the Southeast US with 216 emission elements to be optimized through inversion of synthetic satellite observations. Clouds contaminate 73 %–91 % of the viewing scenes depending on pixel size. Comparison of GEOS-Chem to Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) surface-based methane column observations indicates a model transport error standard deviation of 12 ppb, larger than the instrument errors when aggregated on the 25 km model grid scale, and with a temporal error correlation of 6 h. We find that TROPOMI (7×7 km2 pixels, daily return time) can provide a coarse regional optimization of methane emissions, comparable to results from an aircraft campaign (SEAC4RS), and is highly sensitive to cloud cover. The geostationary instruments can do much better and are less sensitive to cloud cover, reflecting both their finer pixel resolution and more frequent observations. The information content from GeoCARB toward constraining methane emissions increases by 20 %–25 % for each doubling of the GeoCARB measurement frequency. Temporal error correlation in the transport model moderates but does not cancel the benefit of more frequent measurements for geostationary instruments. We find that GeoCARB observing twice a day would provide 70 % of the information from the nominal GEO-CAPE mission preformulated by NASA in response to the Decadal Survey of the US National Research Council.
Highlights
Methane is the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas after CO2 (Myhre et al, 2013), and plays a key role in tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (Thompson, 1992; West and Fiore, 2005; Solomon et al, 2010)
We apply an Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) for the Southeast US to compare the ability of new satellite instruments to characterize methane emissions down to the 25 km scale, using results from the recent SEAC4RS aircraft campaign in the region as reference (Sheng et al, 2018)
The information content from different satellite observing configurations is diagnosed by the DOFs, as described in the Methods section, representing the number of pieces of information on emissions that can be retrieved by inversion of synthetic observations
Summary
Methane is the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas after CO2 (Myhre et al, 2013), and plays a key role in tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (Thompson, 1992; West and Fiore, 2005; Solomon et al, 2010). Turner et al (2018) conducted a kilometer-resolution OSSE to explore the potential of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions on the scale of an oil/gas field, and Cusworth et al (2018) extended that work to examine the ability of the satellites to detect anomalous high-mode point source emitters. We conduct a comparative analysis of TROPOMI, GeoCARB, and GEO-CAPE for constraining the spatial distribution of methane emissions at a fine regional scale (25 km), and we investigate more generally how the information content from different satellite observing configurations depends on pixel size, observing frequency, and cloud contamination. This offers an opportunity to directly compare the observing power of satellite instruments to that from a dedicated aircraft campaign
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
