Comparative analysis of alignment algorithms for macular optical coherence tomography imaging

Abstract

BackgroundOptical coherence tomography (OCT) is the most important and commonly utilized imaging modality in ophthalmology and is especially crucial for the diagnosis and management of macular diseases. Each OCT volume is typically only available as a series of cross-sectional images (B-scans) that are accessible through proprietary software programs which accompany the OCT machines. To maximize the potential of OCT imaging for machine learning purposes, each OCT image should be analyzed en bloc as a 3D volume, which requires aligning all the cross-sectional images within a particular volume.MethodsA dataset of OCT B-scans obtained from 48 age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients and 50 normal controls was used to evaluate five registration algorithms. After alignment of B-scans from each patient, an en face surface map was created to measure the registration quality, based on an automatically generated Laplace difference of the surface map–the smoother the surface map, the smaller the average Laplace difference. To demonstrate the usefulness of B-scan alignment, we trained a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect age-related macular degeneration (AMD) on OCT images and compared the performance of the model with and without B-scan alignment.ResultsThe mean Laplace difference of the surface map before registration was 27 ± 4.2 pixels for the AMD group and 26.6 ± 4 pixels for the control group. After alignment, the smoothness of the surface map was improved, with a mean Laplace difference of 5.5 ± 2.7 pixels for Advanced Normalization Tools Symmetric image Normalization (ANTs-SyN) registration algorithm in the AMD group and a mean Laplace difference of 4.3 ± 1.4.2 pixels for ANTs in the control group. Our 3D CNN achieved superior performance in detecting AMD, when aligned OCT B-scans were used (AUC 0.95 aligned vs. 0.89 unaligned).ConclusionsWe introduced a novel metric to quantify OCT B-scan alignment and compared the effectiveness of five alignment algorithms. We confirmed that alignment could be improved in a statistically significant manner with readily available alignment algorithms that are available to the public, and the ANTs algorithm provided the most robust performance overall. We further demonstrated that alignment of OCT B-scans will likely be useful for training 3D CNN models.