Abstract

This paper proposes a comparative performance analysis based on 4-E (Energy, Exergy, Environment, and Economic) of a bottoming pure Ammonia (NH3) based Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and Ammonia-water (NH3-H2O) based Kalina Cycle System 11(KCS 11) for additional power generation through condenser waste heat recovery integrated with a conventional 500MWe Subcritical coal-fired thermal power plant. A typical high-ash Indian coal is used for the analysis. The flow-sheet computer programme ‘Cycle Tempo’ is used to simulate both the cycles for thermodynamic performance analysis at different plant operating conditions. Thermodynamic analysis is done by varying different NH3 mass fraction in KCS11 and at different turbine inlet pressure in both ORC and KCS11. Results show that the optimum operating pressure of ORC and KCS11 with NH3 mass fraction of 0.90 are about 15 bar and 11.70 bar, respectively and more than 14 bar of operating pressure, the plant performance of ORC integrated power plant is higher than the KCS11 integrated power plant and the result is observed reverse below this pressure. The energy and exergy efficiencies of ORC cycle are higher than the KCS11 by about 0.903 % point and 16.605 % points, respectively under similar saturation vapour temperature at turbine inlet for both the cycles. Similarly, plant energy and exergy efficiencies of ORC based combined cycle power plant are increased by 0.460 % point and 0.420 % point, respectively over KCS11 based combined cycle power plant. Moreover, the reduction of CO2 emission in ORC based combined cycle is about 3.23 t/hr which is about 1.5 times higher than the KCS11 based combined cycle power plant. Exergy destruction of the evaporator in ORC decreases with increase in operating pressure due to decrease in temperature difference of heat exchanging fluids. Exergy destruction rate in the evaporator of ORC is higher than KCS11 when the operating pressure of ORC reduces below 14 bar. This happens due to variable boiling temperature of NH3-H2O binary mixture in KCS11 and resulting in less irreversibility during the process of heat transfer. Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) generation and the cost of implementation of ORC integrated power plant is about Rs.1.767/- per kWh and Rs. 2.187/- per kg of fuel saved, respectively whereas, the LCoE for KCS11 based combined power plant is slightly less than the ORC based combined cycle power plant and estimated as about Rs.1.734 /- per kWh. The cost of implementation of KCS11 based combined cycle power plant is about Rs. 0.332/- per kg of fuel saved. Though the energy and exergy efficiencies of ORC is better than KCS11 but considering the huge investment for developing the combined cycle power plant based on ORC in comparison with KCS11 below the operating pressure of 14 bar, KCS11 is superior than NH3 based ORC.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call