COMPARATION OF EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT PERIOPERATIVE MEDICAL PREPARATION SCHEMES FOR TRANSPAPILLAR ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTIONS

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The intensity of peristaltic activity has significant impact on the duration of transpapillar endoscopic interventions and in some cases (juxtapapillary diverticulum, stenotising papillitis or severe oedema of papilla) can impede operations. Therefore, proper inhibition of duodenal peristalsis is one of the important preconditions for successful fulfilment of such procedures. The aim of the study was to carry out comparative analysis of impact of antispasmodic medications used through the perioperative period on the quality of transpapillar endoscopic interventions. Case histories of patients, who were treated at the Surgical Department of Municipal Enterprise “Sklifosovskiy Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital” for 2017-2019, were investigated, and 75 cases were chosen for further analysis. We divided our cohort in two groups depending on medications used for duodenal peristalsis inhibition: I group – hyoscine butyl bromide (1 ml 2% solution intramuscular injection); II – hyoscine butyl bromide (1 ml 2% solution intramuscular injection), and atropine (1ml 0,1% solution intramuscular injection). Time needed for selective cannulation, total procedure length, number and type of adverse events during manipulation and in early postoperative period were compared between the groups. After statistical data processing the following conclusions were made: 1) proper medical preparation significantly facilitates the implementation of transpapillar endoscopic interventions; 2) combined scheme to reduce duodenal peristalsis, which includes hyoscine butyl bromide and atropine, is not superior to hyoscine butyl bromide alone.