Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the commutability of external quality assessment (EQA) materials and candidate reference materials (RMs) for plasma renin activity (PRA) assay. Commutabilities of 16 candidate RMs were measured along with 40 clinical samples by the four different routine PRA assays, including three LC‒MS/MS assays and onechemiluminescence immunoassay. Sixteen candidate RMs included native/spiked human plasma pools (small-scale pools with <50 individuals) and current EQA materials (large-scale pools with >1,000 individuals). Difference inbias approach and linear regression with prediction interval approach were adopted to determine the commutability. Two-way variance analysis was used to estimate the effects of spiked and pool size on the commutability. Stability and homogeneity studies were performed. Precision and correlation performance of all assays was acceptable. In the difference in bias approach, thecommutability results were not satisfactory (noncommutability: 14/16) and significant sample-specific effects were detected in assay pairs using different incubation buffers. For the prediction interval approach, no commutability was observed in the spiked small-scale pools; EQA materials (4/9) had more satisfactory commutability among all assays than the small-scale pools (2/7); RMs of large-scale pools tend to have better commutability no matter spiked ornot. Commutable RMs were obtainable but challenging. Current EQA materials with relatively good commutability, stability, and homogeneity were appropriate RMs. Large-scale pools are tending to be commutable. Spiking in small-scale pools was not suggested to prepare RMs. MPs adopting a uniform incubation buffer would be preferable for further commutability research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call