Communication, technology and ageing: elderly, senior citizen groups and interaction process in the information age

Adriano Pasqualotti,Dante Augusto Couto Barone,Johannes Doll

doi:10.1590/s0104-12902012000200016

Adriano Pasqualotti, Dante Augusto Couto Barone + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902012000200016

Copy DOI

Abstract

A computational environment will only change the nature of interactionist activity if the changes that are occurring in methods of communication are looked at, as this should favor cooperative work. In order to develop tools that provide opportunity for building knowledge by means of interaction, it is necessary to be aware of biopsychosocial aspects and understand the liberating potential of the communicative processes that are established when individuals interact while mediated through technology. Beginning with a sociohistorical conception of social interaction, we seek to fill a research space in terms of communicative action and the meaning of social representations regarding communication and information technologies. We analyze the triad of communication, technology and ageing, questions are examined that involve elderly people in a biopsychosocial context. We seek to identify symbolic representations in relation to the technologies and analyze the triggered feelings and the meanings of these experiences encountered with the use of these mechanisms. The processes of appropriation are analyzed along with the meaning of technologies with a group of elderly citizens from the city of Passo Fundo - RS, enrolled in informatics workshops. The research is made up of a cross sectional study descriptive nature and population. To analyze relations among the researched variables, applied analysis of variance, chi squared test, factorial analysis and conglomerate analysis. The data was analyzed on a significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). The results indicate that the elderly participate in the workshops especially with the purpose of maximizing the processes of coexistence.

Highlights

According to Rodrigues (2000, p. 29) “people ate not together because they do the same things together, but rather: they are together because they do different things and, to live they depend on others, who do things they do not want or are no longer able to do”
Among the alternatives offered to the elderly, Senior Citizen Groups (SCGs) are highlighted, as, according to the author, they are “important intervention alternatives aimed at the well-being of mature people”
These were used to characterize the research sample with the results found in the 2000 census in relation to people 60 years old or older head of the family, in urban and rural districts in Rio Grande do Sul (IBGE, 2003)

Summary

Introduction

According to Rodrigues (2000, p. 29) “people ate not together because they do the same things together, but rather: they are together because they do different things and, to live they depend on others, who do things they do not want or are no longer able to do”. 29) “people ate not together because they do the same things together, but rather: they are together because they do different things and, to live they depend on others, who do things they do not want or are no longer able to do”. Both life and history are each a “network” built within the group (Werneck, 1997). Among the alternatives offered to the elderly, Senior Citizen Groups (SCGs) are highlighted, as, according to the author, they are “important intervention alternatives aimed at the well-being of mature people”. According to Portella (2004, p. 24), the ageing process is very personal, as “what is happening with men and women is a discovery that participating in a SCG reduces problems common in this stage of life”

Methods

Results

Conclusion