Abstract

Common Law Parol Evidence Rule in UCC and CISG

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Similar Papers

Paper Title
Journal
Date
Author
Proper characterisation of the parol evidence rule and its applicability in international arbitration
Darius Chan ... Louis Lau Yi Hang
Arbitration International | VOL. 37
Darius Chan, et. al.Darius Chan ... Louis Lau Yi Hang
28 Sep 2021
Textual Harassment: A New Historicist Reappraisal of the Parol Evidence Rule on its Four Hundredth Anniversary
Hila Keren
SSRN Electronic Journal | VOL. -
Hila KerenHila Keren
13 Sep 2004
Admission of Extrinsic Evidence for Contract Interpretation: The International Arbitration Culture in Light of the Traditional Divisions
Maxime Panhard
International and Comparative Law Review | VOL. 18
Maxime PanhardMaxime Panhard
01 Dec 2018
Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular difficulty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the
-
-
--
12 Mar 2007
View more papers

More From: SSRN Electronic Journal

Paper Title
Journal
Date
Author
Determinants of Retirement in China: A Lifecycle Analysis of Pension Scheme and Health
Chao Li
SSRN Electronic Journal | VOL. -
Chao LiChao Li
01 Jan 2024
Data Act I: Relationship With General Data Regulation (Gdpr)
Veronica Mbaezue
SSRN Electronic Journal | VOL. -
Veronica MbaezueVeronica Mbaezue
01 Jan 2024
Truth Decay
Simon Chesterman
SSRN Electronic Journal | VOL. -
Simon ChestermanSimon Chesterman
01 Jan 2024
Reviewing The Three Trump Appointees: Ex Ante and Ex Post
Josh Blackman
SSRN Electronic Journal | VOL. -
Josh BlackmanJosh Blackman
01 Jan 2024
View more papers